Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory35.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 12:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 753
67% 568 Pts
64-Core 2,300
142% 2,300 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 32.1
19% 27.5 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 24.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,137
Write 2,020
Mixed 1,428
414% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 71
240% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 589
438% 583 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
399GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,379
Write 23.8
Mixed 38.6
821% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 550
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 4.1
23,420% 185 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
384GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 90.8
Mixed 79.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB 40GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 42
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback