Today's hottest deals

Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 539
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 63.3
52% 66.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 55
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 70 72 65 67 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 124
Write 98.6
Mixed 105
SusWrite 69.2
22% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 24.4
86% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 84
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 85
65% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
891GB free
Firmware: 030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 399 390 414 428 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 447
Write 410
Mixed 384
SusWrite 406
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 20.4
98% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 36.7
89% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
293GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 81
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 99.2
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
295GB free
Firmware: 3E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 94 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 100
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 92.7
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
24GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 37 19 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 130
Write 56.9
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 27.6
86% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.4
220% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
225GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 37.8
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 40.9
49% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 2 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460
Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback