Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory20.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 12:23
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 416
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 4.9
6% 7.13 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 6.8
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 6%
ATI Radeon HD 3450
Dell(1028 9018) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 44 56 41 38 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 109
Write 101
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 42.2
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
305GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 97.8
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 116
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
2GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.4
Write 55.3
Mixed 43.1
39% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
64GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 84.2
Write 84.3
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 73.1
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ RD 1TB
225GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26
Write 24.6
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 17.9
17% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 56%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
86GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 14.3
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 2C 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 ID:80 AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB ID:80 2C 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback