Today's hottest deals

Intel DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DQ67SW__
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '17 at 15:01
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 332
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2008) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2Z Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 119
Write 99.8
Mixed 110
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.14
61% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
433GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 70.5
119% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.21
68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 45%
SAMSUNG HD321HJ 320GB
240GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 20.6
Mixed 21.7
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.38
86% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
155GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 32.5
Mixed 14.7
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.39
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
WDC WD25 00JB-00GVA0 250GB
64GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback