Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Memory 20.8 1-Core 14.4 2-Core 31.8 14% 22.3 Pts	4-Core 29.5 8-Core 29 4% 29.2 Pts	64-Core 29.7 2% 29.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SAMSUNG HD321HJ 320GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 227GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 31 30 34 31 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 34.1 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 31 46% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM