PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210712 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 29 '21 at 11:44 |
Run Duration | 523 Seconds |
Run User | BRN-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
97.2%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 440 443 447 448 403 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
773GB free
Firmware: 1AN10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 79 78 76 76 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
519GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 94 93 94 88 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
607GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 26 36 35 42 24 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
419GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 63 63 63 58 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
492GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 6.1 5.6 6 5.2 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
393GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0 0.1 1.3 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
592GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 62 60 64 59 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
703GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.1 MB/s
|
24%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
336GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 63 60 23 2 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
608GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 94 92 89 79 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
566GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 75 76 74 70 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
924GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0 0 3.5 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
398GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 97 95 93 81 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
927GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.1 44 58 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
831GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 75 76 74 71 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
589GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 64 64 64 59 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | GSM774F LG HDR 4K |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $130Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 3,590x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $122Bench 98%, 65,928 samples | 3,283x |
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $255Bench 99%, 60,132 samples | 1,624x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,345x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $751Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,044x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 1,011x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $896 |