PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 8.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20190118 |
Uptime | 5.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '19 at 03:42 |
Run Duration | 299 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
|
77.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
8.76%
Terrible
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T253LE120G 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.3 2.5 4 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
23GB free
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
19.6%
Very poor
|
||||
21.9%
Poor
|
||||
32.6%
Below average
|
||||
36.3%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
71GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 21 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.9 2 2 2.5 2.1 MB/s
|
1.06%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
604GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 85 84 84 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
25.2%
Poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.8%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 109x |
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 43x |
Core i3 530Intel $40Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 95x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 55x |
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $95 |