Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel 0000
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 685
62% 519 Pts
64-Core 2,016
125% 2,016 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5200_MTFDDAK240TDN 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 362 358 363 364 362 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85% Excellent
Read 423
Write 364
Mixed 268
SusWrite 362
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 29.1
112% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 265
200% 265 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85%
Great: 96%
Sabrent Disk Device 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 214 214 213 214 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 214
Write 209
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 213
233% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
20GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 8.4 8.7 8.6 8.7 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 9.2
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 8
17% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.3
183% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 41.6
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.9" 1280 720 DELF00E DELL E1909W
Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback