Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 284%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 347%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics272% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 348
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,300
118% 990 Pts
64-Core 2,996
185% 2,996 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
272% Outstanding
Lighting 407
Reflection 426
Parallax 490
332% 441 fps
MRender 390
Gravity 426
Splatting 254
282% 357 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 272%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS200T1XHE-00AFY0 2TB
550GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3912 1591 1253 1119 1076 1281 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 4,015
Write 4,343
Mixed 3,006
SusWrite 1,705
733% 3,267 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 88.8
331% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1677
DQ Write 1,301
DQ Mixed 1,455
1,098% 1,478 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 432%
Great: 608%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 508 324 510 452 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,334
Write 1,427
Mixed 709
SusWrite 518
275% 1,247 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 86.7
293% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 519
564% 954 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 268%
Great: 372%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
21GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 398
Mixed 272
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 30.5
116% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 154
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
69GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 155 154 154 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 136
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 155
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
123GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 88 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 166
Write 127
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 87
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 112%
Sabrent Disk Device 10TB
8.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 234 235 234 234 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 227
Mixed 131
SusWrite 234
277% 206 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.6
307% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Sabrent Disk Device 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 231 234 231 234 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 233
Mixed 129
SusWrite 233
278% 207 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.6
320% 4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 108%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 38.6
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback