Today's hottest deals

Gateway NV57H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway NV57H  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway SJV50_HR
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 31
2-Core 47.9
36% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 55.7
8-Core 69.9
8% 62.8 Pts
64-Core 64.3
4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 34 20 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 20.8
8% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 48%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
198GB free, PID 5033
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 19.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 23.2
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G13332S 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NV57H Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway NV57H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback