Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '16 at 19:53
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 87.9
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 74.9
55% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 80.7
8-Core 183
15% 132 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 419
Write 183
Mixed 228
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 9.65
61% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 41.4
53% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 93%
Asmt 2105 1TB
199GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.1
Mixed 26.1
20% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.02
32% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G13332S 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback