Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 05:00
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 767
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 96
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.2
78% 101 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 98.4
79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 262 248 194 135 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 370
Write 246
Mixed 324
SusWrite 206
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 212
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
85GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 422 423 426 299 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 450
Mixed 406
SusWrite 361
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 54.7
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST32000540AS 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 122 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 123
Write 115
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 121
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 159 154 157 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64% Good
Read 168
Write 123
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 157
176% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64%
Great: 74%
ST10000N E0008-2JM101 10TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 159 154 157 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.4% Excellent
Read 213
Write 200
Mixed 200
SusWrite 156
259% 193 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
327% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.5
8% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
137% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 37
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback