Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory35 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 03:37
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 211
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 775
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,187
74% 1,187 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 116
Parallax 129
101% 123 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 121
Splatting 98.1
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 371 437 451 416 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 444
Mixed 415
SusWrite 404
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 45.8
151% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 259
198% 265 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
232GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 398 449 296 297 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 469
Mixed 461
SusWrite 352
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 52.9
177% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 245
220% 333 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 319 379 390 391 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 396
Write 379
Mixed 291
SusWrite 362
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 63.6
72% 121 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST32000540AS 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 77 70 116 115 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 58
Mixed 20
SusWrite 91.8
39% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST32000540AS 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 131 130 128 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 129
66% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
895GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 84
Write 125
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 124
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
211% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-16GVRB F4-3000C16-8GISB F4-3000C16-16GVRB 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback