Today's hottest deals

Emachines EL1300G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines EL1300G  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines WMCP61M
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '17 at 06:08
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 2650e-$30
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 54.7
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 19.1
26% 32.2 Pts
4-Core 22.7
8-Core 22.4
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 23.4
1% 23.4 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Acer(1025 0153) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S200 60GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P062
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 226
Write 176
Mixed 202
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 2.28
48% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 4.17
12% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Ultra 128GB
110GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 10.1
Mixed 14.4
18% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.88
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.64
62% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback