Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509MA
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 48 1-Core 58.3 2-Core 113 42% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 114 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1D91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.3 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 270 275 273 250 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 430 Mixed 471 SusWrite 285 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 49.6 157% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 231 176% 241 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 189%
Kingdian S200 60GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 12GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 77 75 76 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 359 Write 73.7 Mixed 103 SusWrite 75.4 33% 153 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 6.6 41% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.4 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 47.4 45% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 72%
External USB3.0 1TB 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 268GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 77 75 77 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 72 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 75.9 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 72%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 112GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 43 36 33 28 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 82.8 Write 32.9 Mixed 30 SusWrite 34.7 53% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.5 187% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-086.A00G 1x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	74x
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	29x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	91x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	42x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	37x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	20x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	20x

RAM
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GBSK_HynixBench 19%, 218 samples	55x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	38x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350