Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory9.77GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.77GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.8 GB free of 9.76563 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 22:05
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 296
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,144
104% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,607
99% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 200
Parallax 196
169% 201 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 195
Splatting 131
125% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 143%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,703
Write 3,625
Mixed 1,994
759% 3,441 MB/s
4K Read 105
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 101
340% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 630
483% 657 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
218GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 1034 1068 968 994 1053 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
713GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 87 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 87.9
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x9GB
1 of 1 slots used
9GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 28.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback