Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 148
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 147
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.2.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.4% Average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 124
38% 76.9 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 74.4
72% 89.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 21GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,900
Write 1,236
Mixed 1,777
364% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 62.2
206% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 18
33% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 22.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback