Today's hottest deals

HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP hp workstation xw8200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory1.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 51
31% 45.8 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 83.4
11% 80.9 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Asus(1043 8297) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 2.9
7% 7.13 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 3.8
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
90GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 66 72 74 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 73.9
Write 63.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 71.2
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 61%
Fujitsu MAW3300NP 300GB
113GB free
Firmware: HPF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 76 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 81.3
Write 73.6
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 76.4
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.4
259% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 39 23 22 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 42.2
Write 54.6
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 25.9
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback