Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060512
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 65.6
36% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 64.7
8-Core 65.2
9% 64.9 Pts
64-Core 64.3
4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 38 39 34 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 19.1
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 26
14% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback