Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 735 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 735 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8589
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 12:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 20.3
1-Core 71
2-Core 145
39% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 291
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
HP(103C 8589) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1A 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0611A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 126 135 71 42 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 404
Write 331
Mixed 317
SusWrite 91.6
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 14.3
65% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 30.1
56% 108 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 88%
20GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.8
8% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 318
13% 318 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 735 G6 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 735 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback