Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$259
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
94% 180 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 909
95% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 95%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1A 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 367 289 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 477
Write 350
Mixed 400
SusWrite 251
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 39.3
137% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 282
199% 252 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 249 248 249 249 249 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 431
Mixed 411
SusWrite 265
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 158
130% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 118%
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB
202GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 439 295 251 250 246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 455
Write 435
Mixed 376
SusWrite 320
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 35.7
122% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$92
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback