Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba TZ6 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110214
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 86 2-Core 171 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 410 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FCB0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 2.7 5% 4.3 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.1 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$118 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 427 408 405 402 398 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 405 Write 400 Mixed 325 SusWrite 416 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 20.1 69% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 182 183% 294 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 111%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 457GB free Firmware: FG001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 74 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 68.4 Write 68.3 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 73.2 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM