Today's hottest deals

Alienware M11x R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware M11x R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M11x R2
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 U 640
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 72.4
38% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 79.7
8-Core 81.5
11% 80.6 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 0465) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.19% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.23 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3256GSY 320GB-$90
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH013D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 78 78 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 72.2
Write 84
Mixed 32
SusWrite 78
48% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 52%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 26
Write 16.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 14.9
23% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.5
178% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M11x R2 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M11x R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback