PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
Memory | 1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081015 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '21 at 22:26 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
180GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 66 50 68 76 65 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 32 13 9 7.7 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
|
16%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $199 |