Today's hottest deals

EXO HR14

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemEXO HR14  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 07:53
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 16,001,957 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 85.8
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 38.7
38% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 53.1
8-Core 173
12% 113 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 90 93 96 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 99
Write 96
Mixed 52
SusWrite 88.5
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
921GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 124 125 126 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 128
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 125
151% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
103% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BKH400SO25608-1333 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HR14 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: EXO HR14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback