Today's hottest deals

EXO HR14

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEXO HR14  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '17 at 21:48
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 51.9
1-Core 10.2
2-Core 24.1
22% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 28.3
8-Core 32.3
4% 30.3 Pts
64-Core 39.5
2% 39.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 0.81
1% 1.21 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 100
Write 80.9
Mixed 56.9
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.26
69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BKH400SO25608-1333 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HR14 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: EXO HR14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback