Today's hottest deals

Atari VCS 800 Classic

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAtari VCS 800 Classic  (all builds)
MotherboardATARI VCS
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 165
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 276
38% 279 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.2
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 0 7 0 2.6 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 295
Write 299
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 27.4
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 25.4
71% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 59.4
61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 77%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
804GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 22 186 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 302
Write 308
Mixed 216
SusWrite 99.4
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 28.4
83% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 137
102% 134 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VCS 800 Classic Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Atari VCS 800 Classic

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback