Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G Vega Gfx 98 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 103 41% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 177 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 15D8) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 6 3% 5.37 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9.4 6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 12GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 4 3 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.5 Write 1 Mixed 2 SusWrite 3.4 5% 5.47 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB 10,211 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.6 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM