Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, , , , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4930
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 180
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 186
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 71.1
63% 74 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 65
63% 79.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 345 395 416 401 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 174
Write 229
Mixed 233
SusWrite 362
57% 249 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 16.8
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 33.4
72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 99%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
1GB free
Firmware: S3Z40107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 360
Write 240
Mixed 388
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 28.4
100% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 30.4
96% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43MX3-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback