Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 703
66% 546 Pts
64-Core 1069
66% 1069 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 38.6
30% 41.7 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 28.5
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 86 55 73 69 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 444
Write 280
Mixed 292
SusWrite 95.8
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 18.9
59% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 41.8
39% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 53%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43MX3-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback