Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion NC108AA-ABD a6724de

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion NC108AA-ABD a6724de  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON VIOLET
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 11:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 61.8
33% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
MSI(1462 2207) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 5.1
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.5
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hua72101 0KLA330 1TB
591GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 18
Write 21
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 22.9
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 45%
Maxtor OneTouch II 250GB
3GB free, PID 7110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 23
Mixed 21
SusWrite 23.3
30% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.5 3.4 2.8 3.1 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.2
8% 8.78 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 10
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback