Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 08:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 356
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Asus(1043 036C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.8
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$89
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 49 80 54 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 197
Write 122
Mixed 142
SusWrite 72.6
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 12.8
44% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 81.7
77% 121 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 79%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$98
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 144 142 144 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 137
Write 131
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 142
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback