Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 150 54% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 331 42% 319 Pts	64-Core 300 18% 300 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 43 Parallax 29.6 28% 35.7 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 27.1 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB6S256G1001 256GB 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3551201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 57 91 75 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 343 Write 216 Mixed 166 SusWrite 113 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 19.1 77% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 186 145% 204 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 93%
ST350082 0AS 500GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 338GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 41.4 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 41.7 52% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM