Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5811

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M5811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H57M01
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 14:49
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 141
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 273
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
617GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 72 71 78 81 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 91
Write 77
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 70.4
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 68%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
169GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 28 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 16.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 26.4
31% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B2873EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5811 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback