Today's hottest deals

Emachines eME443

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines eME443  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eME443
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 08:57
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 37.9
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 22.3
17% 22.8 Pts
4-Core 22.8
8-Core 22.1
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 21.5
1% 21.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Acer(1025 0602) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.17 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 27 31 34 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 31
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.25% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.1
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical eME443 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines eME443

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback