Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 4752

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4752  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4752
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 02:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 115
54% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0506) 813MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 62 60 50 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 85.8
Write 89.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 70.5
48% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4752 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback