Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 17:27
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 187
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800
Sapphire(174B E620) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 2.5
6% 7.17 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 10
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 135 49 49 31 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 492
Write 408
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 95.5
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 17.5
79% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 0.5
58% 136 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
23GB free
Firmware: 0002HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 28 22 28 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 44.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 22.7
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback