Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '17 at 23:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 547
49% 416 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 35.2
30% 34 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 33.9
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$33
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 476
Write 216
Mixed 238
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 14
58% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 8.89
64% 150 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 101%
Toshiba E300 2TB-$69
814GB free
Firmware: MZ4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70% Good
Read 116
Write 128
Mixed 116
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.15
74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback