Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150119
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 10:45
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 125
59% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 587
51% 437 Pts
64-Core 1167
72% 1167 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 36.1
20% 29.7 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 27.6
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 113 224 115 141 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 396
Write 152
Mixed 240
SusWrite 154
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 10.5
61% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 73.5
67% 104 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 23
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 2R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 28% 18 8 4 165 27" 1280 720 ACR074F KG271 P
History: Score 6: 0R 1G 3B | Score 13: 2R 0G 3B
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback