Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 06:30
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 99.5
46% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 216
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 46.8%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.19 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 7.93
Splatting 8.65
7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.8%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 299 297 306 303 313 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 117 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 90
SusWrite 117
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 67.9%
 Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
747GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 171 171 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 177
Mixed 102
SusWrite 171
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 98.6%
 Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 91 92 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 85.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 90.4
104% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 99.6
125% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.8
248% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 57.4%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 10.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 30%
 Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback