Today's hottest deals

HP 500-205eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-205eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140415
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 10:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 104
46% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 149
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 14
9% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 128 100 139 134 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 170
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 126
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-205eo Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-205eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback