Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory1.3 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 55.4
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 19
27% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 26.5
8-Core 31
4% 28.8 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.56 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 101 101 98 104 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 8.5
Write 73.8
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 96.9
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0.3
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback