Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 23:11
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$386
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 308
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,194
105% 894 Pts
64-Core 1590
98% 1590 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 3507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 55
Parallax 44.7
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 62.2
49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$120
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 555 556 558 553 553 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2382
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,290
SusWrite 614
315% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 84.3
276% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 924
685% 906 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 259%
Great: 293%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
263GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 156 205 45 37 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,381
Write 1237
Mixed 967
SusWrite 251
214% 959 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 75.5
255% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 565
516% 790 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 190%
Great: 282%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$30
406GB free
Firmware: Q0913A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 471 470 472 473 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 438
Mixed 406
SusWrite 468
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 50.3
166% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 296
239% 339 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
481GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.8
Write 77.9
Mixed 48.8
81% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 37%
WDC WD15 00AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
58GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 63 62 61 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
Read 64.9
Write 77.8
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 62.5
84% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
124GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 44.9
Write 44.7
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 0.5
39% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 34%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
383GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 63 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 47.7
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 62.5
78% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 27.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback