PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180628 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 14 '18 at 03:47 |
Run Duration | 264 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
|
75.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 289 485 70 54 50 MB/s
|
||||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$68
543GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 120 117 118 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
399GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 94 94 94 MB/s
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$26
265GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 36 39 41 42 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
550GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 6 6.4 5.1 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD10 01FALS-00Y6A0 1TB
628GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 51 66 67 65 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD15 00AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
132GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 52 67 67 65 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 10 3.1 2.9 2.3 MB/s
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
78.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $170Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 3,048x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $380Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 275x |
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples | 268x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 895x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 372x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 273x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $1,203 |