Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire T180

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire T180  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EM61SM/EM61PM
Memory1.8 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 04:14
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3500+-$54
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Memory 31.5
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 12.2
18% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 20.7
8-Core 26.9
3% 23.8 Pts
64-Core 27.7
2% 27.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100
Elitegroup(1019 2601) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.03
0% 0.11 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.07%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 46
Write 39.3
Mixed 51
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 35%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
33GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 28.4
Mixed 12.9
28% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 246
16% 246 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire T180 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire T180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback