Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 357
51% 374 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 18.2
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 19.8
15% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 190 186 177 170 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 274
Write 183
Mixed 211
SusWrite 175
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 27.1
96% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 40.6
37% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
589GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 138 141 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 154
Mixed 72
SusWrite 141
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
753GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 145 145 141 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 124
Mixed 69
SusWrite 144
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback