Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 23:48
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 295
35% 268 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 39.8
34% 45.4 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 39.4
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
97GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 364 363 379 370 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 388
Write 378
Mixed 367
SusWrite 356
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 32.9
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 277
223% 315 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 125%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 116
Mixed 119
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 16.3
53% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 62.7
57% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 28.9
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
396GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 79 84 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 68
Write 36.3
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 83.6
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback