Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A75M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive2.57% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A75M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 631
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 69.8
34% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 132
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.34
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.47
Splatting 3.22
4% 4.62 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 14 22 24 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.57% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 24.5
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 19.2
5% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
2% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZDX-00SC2B0 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 20 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 16.9
Write 12.4
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 18.6
11% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A75M-S2V Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A75M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback