Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 631 1,364 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 76.8 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 84 45% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 165 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3722) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 65.5 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 63.3 53% 64.8 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 64.5 55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 120GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP612PE0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 436 Write 322 Mixed 233 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 1.6 12% 6.2 MB/s	DQ Read 82.6 DQ Write 6.7 DQ Mixed 30.4 26% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 132GB free Firmware: BBCOC31P SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 49 48 49 49 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 45.8 Write 46.9 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 48 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 30%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 295GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 121 121 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 120 Write 100 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 120 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$33 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 150GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 101 102 102 102 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 89.6 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 101 63% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 2x8GB 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.2 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	10x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	1x
99P5471-004.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 601 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $106

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350