Today's hottest deals

Packard IMEDIA J4500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard IMEDIA J4500  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard PT890-8237A
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070730
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 16:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 50.6
32% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 48.6
8-Core 50.5
7% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 50.4
3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON HD5450
Sapphire(174B A007) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2.19
2% 2.35 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 1.96
2% 1.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 38 26 36 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 49
Write 47
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 32.6
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 32%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$99
68GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 54 50 54 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 57
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 52.4
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.64% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 1.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback